From PsychWiki - A Collaborative Psychology Wiki
have you ever wanted to learn about meta-analysis or conduct a meta-analysis but didnt know where to start? This webpage is devoted to providing
Where should I start?
- If you want to learn what is a meta-analysis...
- For the basics behind meta-analyses see
- For more in-depth
- If you want to start conducting a meta-analysis...
- For the basics behind conducting a meta-analysis, see
- For more in-depth
What is a meta-analysis?
Three Basic Questions
- A meta-analysis answers three general questions:
- Central tendency – The central purpose of a meta-analysis is to test the relationship between two variables such that X causes Y. Central tendency refers to identifying whether X affects Y via statistically summarizing signficance levels, effect sizes, and/or confidence intervals. You are trying to answer whether X affects Y, is the effect significant, and how strong is that effect?
- Variability – There is always going to be some degree of variation between the outcomes of the individual studies that compose the meta-analysis. The question is whether the degree of variablity is signficantly different than what we would expect by chance alone. If so, then its called heterogeneity.
- Prediction – If there is heterogeneity (variablitiy), then we look for moderating variables that explain the variablitty? In other words, does the effect of X on Y differ with moderator variables?
Five Basic Steps
- There are generally five separate steps in conducting a meta-analysis:
- Define your hypothesis
- Locate the Literature
- Identify and input data
- Cacluate Effect Sizes
- Analyze Variables
How do I conduct a meta-analysis?
First, choose what statistical approach suits your needs
- There are generally three different statistical approaches to conduct a meta-analysis so first you need to choose which approach best fits your needs. For an excellent detailed comparison of these three approaches, see (Johnson, Mullen, & Salas, 1995) (Comparison of Three Major Meta-Analytic Approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 94-106). Some basic information from that article is posted below to get you started:
- Hedges & Olkin Approach – (Hedges, 1981); (Hedges, 1982); (Hedges & Olkin, 1985)
- Rosenthal & Rubin Approach – (Rosenthal, 1991); (Rosenthal & Rubin, 1978); (Rosenthal & Rubin, 1988)
- Hunter, Schmidt, & Jackson - (Hunter, Schmidt, & Jackson, 1982); (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990)
Second, choose which effect size to calculate?
Third, choose your variables
If you want to follow the Hedges & Olkin approach...
If you want to follow the Rosenthal & Rubin approach...
If you want to follow the Hunter, Schmidt, & Jackson approach...
Just as an individual study collects data from many individuals (data points) that is statistically summarized to answer the question of interest, a meta-anlay
- What is the good number of studies to have bare minimum for a meta-analysis? A meta-analysis with 10 studies have been published before but is not recommended.
- In a meta-analysis, don’t have raters code conditions for which no effect sizes can be calculated.
- In a meta-analysis, have judge rate each variable across studies, one moderator at a time, instead of rating all variables in a single study before moving on to next study.
- With meta-analysis coding with a high number of studies to code, such as 75+, can have some coders rate the entire set, but can also have some coders (undergrads) code only a subset as long there is overlap, so that more than 1 judge is rating each study.
► Back to Research Tools mainpage