From PsychWiki - A Collaborative Psychology Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
|Line 12:||Line 12:|
► Back to [[Professional_Development|
► Back to [[Professional_Development|of doing Social Psychology research]]
Revision as of 04:01, 6 January 2006
(this page has just been created... can you think of more tips to add...)
- What is the good number of studies to have bare minimum for a meta-analysis? A meta-analysis with 10 studies have been published before but is not recommended.
- In a meta-analysis, don’t have raters code conditions for which no effect sizes can be calculated.
- In a meta-analysis, have judge rate each variable across studies, one moderator at a time, instead of rating all variables in a single study before moving on to next study.
- With meta-analysis coding with a high number of studies to code, such as 75+, can have some coders rate the entire set, but can also have some coders (undergrads) code only a subset as long there is overlap, so that more than 1 judge is rating each study.